A structured, queryable database for adverse crypto signals: enforcement, investigations, warnings, policy hearings, listing friction, scam infrastructure, hacks, insolvency, AML red flags, and jurisdiction-level risk movement.
| Tier | Label | Criteria |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 | Confirmed regulatory or judicial action | Official enforcement, court order, license suspension, prosecution, fine, asset seizure, formal warning, or regulator-published restriction. |
| Tier 2 | Credible negative signal | Policy hearing, official consultation with adverse implications, credible investigation, reported listing rejection/delisting, major exploit, solvency stress, or verified market-access restriction. |
| Tier 3 | Watchlist / early warning | Single-source adverse report, sector-level risk shift, socialized allegation, recurring red-flag pattern, or adjacent enforcement that may affect comparable projects. |
Draft cyber-scam legislation proposes capital punishment for violent scam-compound offenses.
Myanmar's draft cyber-scam bill is not a completed enforcement action, but it is a negative intelligence signal for crypto-facilitated scam infrastructure and regional AML pressure.
AUSTRAC flags DeFi and offshore VASPs as money-laundering blind spots.
The AUSTRAC risk snapshot expands the negative intelligence surface beyond completed enforcement into AML blind spots likely to shape future supervision.
Central bank action reportedly suspends OTC virtual asset activity over AML control failures.
Banco Topazio is a structured negative intelligence entry because it links AML failures, virtual asset OTC activity, and bank-supervised settlement infrastructure.