Home / Policy Tracker / Policy Event
Policy Event · High impact

South Korea Digital Asset Basic Act Confirms 20% Exchange Ownership Cap

Korea TechDesk reports policy implementation details of South Korea's Digital Asset Basic Act, confirming the controversial 20% ownership cap for major shareholders of cryptocurrency exchanges. The regulation aims to institutionalize the digital asset sector and align it with traditional financial oversight. The policy could accelerate governance restructuring across major exchanges including Bithumb and Korbit, potentially reshaping competitive dynamics in Korea's crypto trading market.

High impact🇰🇷 South KoreaRegulationExchangeBTCETHBithumbKorbit

APAC FINSTAB analysis

For APAC operators, this creates a high-impact signal around regulation, exchange in South Korea. Protocols/assets in scope: BTC, ETH. Named institutions or platforms: Bithumb, Korbit. Teams should monitor the original source, map the change to licensing, custody, disclosure, and market-access obligations, and update their jurisdiction playbooks before the next compliance review.

Compliance read-through: map this event to entity licensing, market-access, custody, disclosure, token listing, and operational-risk obligations before expanding or marketing in the affected jurisdiction.

View related Regulation tracker page →

Related policy events

CPC Decision Targets Crypto-Enabled Corruption And Cross-Border Asset Recovery

A CPC Central Committee decision published by Xinhua calls for resolute action against corruption involving the internet, virtual currencies, cross-border funds, and blockchain, alongside stronger cross-border casework and asset recovery. The policy signal increases expectations for transaction tracing, beneficial-owner checks, and cooperation with enforcement requests at digital-asset intermediaries.

High impact🇨🇳 ChinaRegulationAMLEnforcement
APAC FINSTAB analysis → Original source ↗

FCA Consults On DeFi Guidance For Regulated Firms

The UK Financial Conduct Authority opened GC26/7 consultation on non-Handbook guidance for regulated firms using DeFi, covering operational resilience, financial-crime controls and Money Laundering Regulations obligations. The guidance would clarify how existing controls apply to DeFi dependencies such as smart contracts, bridges and oracle services.

High impact🇬🇧 United KingdomRegulationAMLDeFi
APAC FINSTAB analysis → Original source ↗